Following the release of "The Raja Saab," star Prabhas found himself at the center of an online debate after some viewers alleged that body doubles were used excessively during his action sequences. The criticism raised broader questions about whether the actor was avoiding physically risky stunt work, prompting a response from those with direct, professional insight into his on-set process.
Stunt Masters Step In to Clarify
Veteran stunt choreographers Ram and Laxman, who have worked closely with Prabhas across multiple projects, addressed the controversy directly in an interview with Great Andhra. According to the duo, such criticism often stems from a lack of understanding about what actually happens during action filmmaking. They emphasized that in their experience working with Prabhas, the actor consistently arrives on set prepared and willing to take on physically demanding tasks, often staying for extended periods to ensure his sequences are completed properly.
Why It Matters: Unpacking Misconceptions About Stunt Work
This clarification touches on a broader, often misunderstood aspect of action filmmaking-the routine and necessary use of stunt doubles, even for actors who are otherwise highly involved in performing their own action sequences. As action cinema becomes increasingly elaborate and technically demanding, the line between what an actor performs personally versus what requires professional stunt execution is often misread by audiences, particularly when viral images or short clips are taken out of context.
Ram and Laxman's comments aim to reframe this narrative, suggesting that the presence of a body double in certain shots doesn't necessarily reflect an actor's overall commitment or physical involvement in a film's action sequences.
A Broader Point About Fair Comparisons
The stunt masters also used the opportunity to address a larger pattern they've observed within the industry-unfair comparisons between actors regarding action performance. They pointed out that with Telugu cinema now operating at a pan-India scale, actors across different age groups face varying levels of physical capability and risk tolerance. According to Ram and Laxman, some actors may choose to minimize certain risks they cannot safely perform, while others may be more willing to take on physically demanding stunts-variations they argue should be understood as normal, rather than judged uniformly. "Each actor works according to their age and ability," they noted, cautioning against sweeping generalizations.
The Viral BTS Video That Sparked Discussion
Adding another layer to the controversy, a parkour athlete had earlier shared a behind-the-scenes video from the film's set, which offered a more nuanced look at the situation. The footage showed Prabhas going through makeup and preparation before performing a fight sequence himself. However, the same video also revealed instances where a body double was used for certain portions of the scene-fueling further discussion online about the exact division between the actor's personal performance and stunt double involvement.
This pattern isn't unique to Prabhas; a similar controversy involving co-star Malavika Mohanan had also surfaced around the same film, with the actress publicly clarifying that stunt doubles are a standard part of the filmmaking process, used for rehearsals and particularly risky shots, even when actors perform the majority of their own action sequences.
What's Next for Prabhas
Amid this ongoing conversation, Prabhas is set to return to screens with his upcoming film "Fauji," scheduled for release on December 3. The film features a notable ensemble cast, including Sanjay Dutt, Nidhi Agarwal, Malavika Mohanan, Riddhi Kumar, and Zarina Wahab in significant roles.
Industry Takeaway
The clarification from Ram and Laxman highlights an important, often overlooked reality of contemporary action filmmaking-the collaborative and layered nature of stunt work, where even highly committed actors rely on professional doubles for specific high-risk sequences. As pan-India cinema continues to raise the bar for action spectacle, this incident underscores the need for more informed public discourse around what genuine on-screen commitment actually looks like, beyond viral images or out-of-context clips.